Plasma is the most limited.
Waterjet vs laser cutting cost.
The cutting stream of a water jet is typically 030 040 in.
Waterjet cutting is much slower and much more costly per hour of use.
Laser cutting cost in terms of operation is not even close.
In thickness of 1 4 and less the laser would be the more cost effective option when cutting metals.
What is waterjet cutting.
Many advertisements for fiber laser tout its ability to cut brass copper and aluminum.
Laser is limited to metalics some plastics and fiberglass some fabric.
The choice of whether to use waterjet or laser for your next cutting job depends entirely on what your specifications are.
However back then the process was only used to cut soft materials such as food or paper.
It can only cut conductive metals and is really only practical for mild steel stainless steel and aluminum.
Waterjet cutting has been used as far back as the 1930s.
With the automatic dual pallet loading system and lights out capability we can ensure quick.
Laser advantages and disadvantages.
Generally though laser will cut faster on aluminum less than 0 20 in.
Waterjet cutting is by far the most flexible of these 3 cutting processes because it can cut almost any material.
4 laser cutting vs.
Combined with the speed and precision of cutting waterjet vs.
Because fixed tooling and fixturing are generally not required in either cutting process set up costs are minimal for both.
Thick and brass less than 0 16 in.
This article explores some of the waterjet vs.
Laser cutters can cut thick materials but a waterjet machine can cut thicker objects the optimal thickness being 0 4 to 2 0 10 to 50 mm while for laser cutting it is 0 12 to 0 4 3 to 10 mm.
Say you have a project that.
Because these materials are quite soft they are also good candidates for an abrasive waterjet.
Waterjet cost factors operating costs.
The accuracy and quality of the cut.
Let s do some quick math.
